The Ombudsman’s office received a complaint that a former member (“the Former Member”) of St Harmon Community Council (“the Council”) had breached the Code of Conduct. It was alleged that the Former Member had failed to declare interests at 2 Council meetings when a report by Audit Wales was discussed.
The investigation considered whether the Former Member failed to comply with the following provisions of the Code of Conduct:
- 6(1)(a) – Members must not conduct themselves in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing their office or authority into disrepute.
- 7(a) – Members must not in their official capacity or otherwise, use or attempt to use their position improperly to confer on or secure for themselves, or any other person, an advantage or create or avoid for themselves, or any other person, a disadvantage.
- 10(1) – Members must in all matters consider whether they have a personal interest, and whether the Code of Conduct requires them to disclose that interest.
- 10(2)(c) – Members must regard themselves as having a personal interest in any business of their authority if a decision upon it might reasonably be regarded as affecting their wellbeing or financial position, or that of a person with whom they live, or any person with whom they have a close personal association.
- 11(1) – Where a member has a personal interest in any business of their authority and they attend a meeting at which that business is considered, they must disclose orally to that meeting the existence and nature of that interest before or at the commencement of that consideration, or when the interest becomes apparent.
- 11(2) – Where a Member has a personal interest in any business of their authority and they make oral representations to a member or officer of their authority they should disclose the interest at the commencement of such representations, or when it becomes apparent to them that they have such an interest, and confirm the representation and interest in writing within 14 days of the representation.
- 12(1) – Where a Member has a personal interest in any business of their authority, they also have a prejudicial interest in that business if the interest is one which a member of the public with knowledge of the relevant facts would reasonably regard as so significant that it is likely to prejudice their judgement of the public interest.
- 14(1)(a) – Subject to sub-paragraphs (2), (2A), (3) and (4), where a member has a prejudicial interest in any business of their authority they must, unless they have obtained a dispensation from their authority’s standards committee withdraw from the room, chamber or place where a meeting considering the business is being held —
i. where sub-paragraph (2) applies, immediately after the period for making representations, answering questions or giving evidence relating to the business has ended and, in any event, before further consideration of the business begins, whether or not the public are allowed to remain in attendance for such consideration; or
ii. in any other case, whenever it becomes apparent that that business is being considered at that meeting.
- 14(1)(c) – Subject to sub-paragraphs (2), (2A), (3) and (4), where a member has a prejudicial interest in any business of their authority they must, unless they have obtained a dispensation from their authority’s standards committee, not seek to influence a decision about business.
- 14(1)(e) – Subject to sub-paragraphs (2), (2A), (3) and (4), where a member has a prejudicial interest in any business of their authority they must, unless they have obtained a dispensation from their authority’s standards committee, not make any oral representations (whether in person or some form of electronic communication) in respect of that business or immediately cease to make such oral representations when the prejudicial interest becomes apparent.
The Former Member admitted that she was aware that she had personal and prejudicial interests, but she did not declare them as she did not want to be made to leave the meetings. She agreed that she had addressed Council and took part in votes at both Council meetings. The Former Member said that she had no regrets about her actions.
The investigation found that the Former Member’s conduct was suggestive of a breach of paragraphs 6(1)(a), 7(a), 11(1), 14(1)(a), 14 (1)(c) and 14(1)(e) of the Code of Conduct.
The Tribunal concluded that the Member had breached paragraphs 11(1), 14(1)(a) and 14(1)(e) of the Code of conduct by failing to disclose the existence and nature of personal and prejudicial interests in relevant business, in failing to withdraw from meetings dated 1 April and 3 November 2021 and in making oral representations in respect of that business in the meetings. The Tribunal also concluded that the Member had breached paragraph 6(1)(a) of the Code of Conduct by conducting herself at such meetings in a manner which could reasonably be regarded as bringing her office or authority into disrepute. The Tribunal further concluded that the Member had breached paragraphs 7(a) and 14(1)(c) of the Code of Conduct by using or attempting to use her position improperly to avoid a disadvantage for another person and seeking to influence a decision about relevant business. Accordingly, the Tribunal decided that the Member should be disqualified for 12 months from being or becoming a member of the authority or of any other relevant authority.